The Bird on a Plane

Share with Friends & Family.

Missing the Blindspot

The modern sustainability leader faces a paradox of perception. The complexity of the field demands deep specialization, yet the interconnected nature of the problems requires a holistic view. Most professionals master a single lens. They become fluent in the foreign language of compliance, the pointed logic of technology, or the elusive art of strategy. This expertise is valuable but often creates blind spots, an inability to see the system's other critical dimensions. Nilesh Dayalapwar's career showcases an alternative to this paradigm. His journey has not been a linear path toward a single specialization but a deliberate cultivation of three distinct professional mindsets.

Nilesh forged a doctrine of perspectives, integrating three occupational identities into a unified operating system. He embodies the skeptical Auditor, who demands empirical proof and understands the unyielding logic of compliance. He retains the mind of the Engineer, a systems thinker fluent in the binary world of technology that either works or fails. Finally, he operates as the strategic Consultant, who navigates the non-binary world of human behavior, manages global stakeholders, and architects innovative solutions for a prosperous future.

How does one person simultaneously embody the roles of critic, builder, and architect? What reasoning emerges when a demand for absolute accuracy must coexist with a flexible, forward-looking vision? Dayalapwar’s professional life is a trial in integrating competing worldviews. More than switching occupations, he synthesized their core philosophies to build a more resilient model for understanding the system as a whole. His work provides a rare insight into solving the critical challenge of our time: how to build for a complex future when your past is rooted in a world of logic that was, by comparison, much simpler.

"Analytical engineering would be much easier than sustainability, 10 years back."

An Accurate Standing

Every strong philosophy requires a firm stand. For Nilesh Dayalapwar, that foundation was born in the exacting world of auditing. The auditor’s role is inherently skeptical. It is a discipline that demands rigorous verification, a deep understanding of compliance, and an unwavering focus on the technical details before any judgment can be made. This mindset, cultivated early in his career, became the first of his three lenses. It is the source of his demand for empirical proof, a skeptical foundation that grounds all his strategic work in verifiable reality. It is a direct defense against the most pervasive threat in postcolonial sustainability: a well-intentioned claim that cannot withstand scrutiny.

This auditor’s lens is most critical in his approach to data. In a sector increasingly reliant on automated ESG tools, Dayalapwar sees a significant danger. Companies are at risk of trusting the output of a "black box" without interrogating the integrity of its inputs. An ESG dashboard can provide a comforting sense of progress, but if the data feeding it is flawed, the entire exercise becomes spiraling fiction. He argues that without a human expert who understands the patterns in the data and questions anomalies, a company can easily be misled by its own technology. An automated system might report a 10-ton increase in emissions while the company's goal was a 10% reduction. Without the auditor's skeptical oversight, such a critical failure could go unnoticed until it results in missed targets or government penalties.

For Dayalapwar, this necessitates a culture of internal verification. Technology is a powerful tool for scaling and managing data, but is not a substitute for human judgment and expertise. He argues for the necessity of skilled, in-house teams who can perform their own "internal orbit of the data," ensuring its accuracy before it is reported or used for decision-making. This skepticism is not a barrier to progress. It is the prerequisite for it. The anchor prevents a company’s sustainability journey from becoming an exercise in greenwashing. Before he can wear the hat of the strategic innovator, he must first apply the auditor's lens to establish a non-negotiable baseline of truth.

"If I didn't track the data, or if I didn't track it on the internal orbit of the data, you will get the accurate, inaccurate results."

Circular Reasoning

The auditor’s lens provided Nilesh Dayalapwar with a foundation in empirical truth. The second lens, that of the Engineer, gave him a native fluency in the language of systems. His electrical and electronics engineering background shaped a mindset built on logic and binary outcomes. A circuit either works or it does not. A system is on or it is off. With its clean, predictable elementary physics, this worldview was the first to be challenged by the messy realities of sustainability. The transition forced him to confront a brutal fact. The most complex systems are not made of wires and code. They are made of flesh, blood, and human DNA.

Sustainability, he discovered, is not a clean electrical circuit. It is a "human circuit," a system dominated by variables that defy simple logic: stakeholder resistance, market irrationality, and the powerful force of ingrained behavior. A technically perfect solution can fail if a key department fears its impact on their sensitive budget or workflow. A procurement team, for example, may resist a new sustainable sourcing policy not because it is illogical, but because it disrupts their existing supplier relationships and dependable cost structures. Consumers may hear every rational argument for a superior product and still choose the one that simply "looks greener". This human element was the most significant, unpredictable variable for an engineer trained to solve for the most logical path.

This challenge did not cause him to abandon his systems thinking. It forced him to expand it. He learned that if you cannot always re-engineer the internal wiring of human motivation, you must find a way to control the external current. This led to a pragmatic realization. While he could spend years trying to convince stakeholders with logic, the most powerful driver of change in human systems is often not voluntary adoption but non-negotiable rules. He understood that to make the human circuit behave predictably, he needed to master the language of mandates and regulations. This insight was the critical evolution of his philosophy, the point where the pure technician began to merge with the strategist. He understood the path to a logical outcome was often not rooted in logic alone.

"Sustainability will only be driven by compliance. Voluntarily, it will take a long time."

The Competitive Design

If the Auditor provides the foundation and the Engineer understands the circuit, the Consultant designs the building. This third lens is the most forward-looking component of Nilesh Dayalapwar's philosophy. It is the architectural mindset he developed to move beyond verifying the past and analyzing the present. The consultant’s role is to construct the future. This requires a shift from grounding skepticism to an elevated strategic vision, from identifying problems to designing innovative solutions, and from focusing on internal systems to understanding a company’s place in the broader global ecosystem. It is the lens that allows him not just to diagnose a company’s blind spots but to draw them a map to a more resilient and competitive future.

The core of this designer mindset is what Dayalapwar calls the "global view". He argues that one of the most significant connections sustainability managers miss is the link between their local operations and global regulatory trends. For example, a company focused solely on domestic compliance in India may be entirely unprepared for the business impact of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). This inconspicuous lack of foresight is not a minor oversight because it represents a critical business risk that can lead to severe penalties or a fatal loss of market access. The consultant’s primary function is to scan this global horizon, identify these long-range threats and opportunities, and translate them into an actionable, proactive strategy for the client. It is an approach that links a company’s internal directive to the world’s demands, building bridges between teams and distant geographies.

Dayalapwar's method for engagement is a practical application of this strategic foresight. When approaching a company new to ESG, his first step is not to audit but to benchmark them against their competitors and develop a clear, multi-year roadmap. He then targets the two most critical internal stakeholders: the R&D team that produces the product and the Marketing team that sells it. He creates awareness by speaking their language. He shows the marketing team how competitors win clients with green certifications, directly linking sustainability to their KPIs and the company’s profitability. He shows the R&D team that future regulations will require product redesigns requiring a three-to-four-year lead time, creating a sense of urgency. This targeted education and strategic alignment process is the essence of the consultant’s craft: making the abstract future feel immediate and actionable today.

"If I'm unaware of global trends and regulations, it will impact their business."

Feathers on a Plane

The Auditor, the Engineer, and the Consultant. Examined in isolation, they are distinct professional mindsets. Within Nilesh Dayalapwar, they are not separate roles but integrated components of his single, multilayered identity. His professional journey has been an exercise in synthesis, arranging these perspectives to create a more resilient and complete design for leadership. When faced with a challenge, he explores the landscape through all three lenses simultaneously. He can identify the non-negotiable compliance risks with the Auditor's skepticism, map the technical pathways with the Engineer's logic, and navigate the human barriers and strategic opportunities with his Consultant's foresight. This integrated vision allows him to see the whole system, navigating through the blind spots that often trap ambitious specialists.

The ultimate expression of this synthesized philosophy is his sharp, nuanced critique of tech-solutionism. As a technologist by training, Dayalapwar speaks the language of digital innovation. He recognizes that ESG software is a powerful enabler, crucial for managing data, automating reporting, and creating organizational transparency. Yet his experience has taught him the limitations of these tools. His core argument directly challenges the modern faith in automation as a panacea for complex human problems. Technology can solve for efficiency and scale, but not for the most critical variables in the sustainability equation: trust, inspiration, and human judgment.

This culminates in his central doctrine: the clear distinction between the driver and the tool. A sophisticated ESG platform can track KPIs and generate reports, but cannot convince a resistant department to change its workflow. It cannot build trust with a skeptical leadership team. It cannot inspire a workforce to adopt a culture of accountability. These human tasks require sophisticated human experience-based leadership, empathy, and strategic communication. Dayalapwar argues that the greatest mistake a company can make is to believe that purchasing a tool is a substitute for cultivating in-house expertise. His philosophy establishes a clear hierarchy. People, with their values and judgment, are the indispensable drivers of change. Machines and software are the tools they execute with. A tool cannot function without a skilled operator, and an organization that puts its faith in the dashboard alone is not more of a driver than a bird in a cage on a plane.

"In the end, machines are tools, and people are the drivers who will execute those tools."

What I Learned From Nilesh Dayalapwar

Expertise requires multiple lenses. True mastery in a complex field is not about having the deepest single specialization but integrating multiple, competing perspectives. A leader who can think like a skeptic, an engineer, and a strategist is the one who can navigate the blind spots that trap others.
Skepticism is the foundation of trust. In a sector where claims are easily made, a rigorous, data-driven skepticism is not a barrier to progress; it is the prerequisite for it. The auditor’s demand for verifiable proof is the only anchor that keeps a sustainability mission from becoming an exercise in "spiraling fiction."
Logical solutions fail in human systems. Even the most perfectly engineered plan will break against the irrationality of the "human circuit." The critical lesson is that to create predictable change in unpredictable human systems, one must master the language of mandates and compliance, as rules often drive behavior more effectively than reason.
A local focus is a global risk. A leader who is not scanning the global horizon for regulatory trends and opportunities is managing for yesterday. True strategic leadership involves understanding the interconnectedness of global markets and translating long-range threats into an immediate, competitive advantage.
Never mistake the tool for the driver. The most dangerous modern leadership fallacy is to put faith in the dashboard alone. As the "bird on a plane" metaphor illustrates, an organization can experience motion without agency. The indispensable drivers of change are not machines, but the skilled, value-driven people who have the judgment to operate them.