top of page

Design-Do-Reflect. Any Questions?

Updated: May 24

My NoSmalltalk session with Ratnesh Mathur


Conventional education operates largely as a content delivery system optimized for standardized assessment. It dictates what is learned and when. Aarohi Life Education, as elucidated by co-founder Ratnesh, fundamentally inverts this. Instead of a curriculum, its operational core appears to be a self-propelled, iterative cycle: Design -> Do -> Reflect.

This isn't merely project-based learning; analyzed closely, it functions as a systemic engine for cultivating autonomous learning, metacognitive skill, and intrinsic motivation, deliberately replacing external benchmarks with internal ones.

Design: Seizing Agency in Learning

The initiation point of the cycle is the learner architecting their own engagement. Ratnesh underscores that "the child is the leader," tasked with planning their activities on various timescales – daily, weekly, monthly. This "Design" phase immediately transfers agency. Instead of consuming a pre-set timetable, the learner must engage in executive functions: prioritizing, sequencing, allocating resources (time, attention). This isn't just scheduling; it's the foundational act of constructing one's own learning path, forcing a level of intentionality absent in passive reception. The challenge isn't if they will learn, but how they will structure their own process to do so.

Do: Contextual Skill Acquisition Through Action

The "Do" phase leverages self-directed action as the primary learning modality. Aarohi's rejection of a subject hierarchy is critical here; chosen activities, whether football or business analysis, are treated as equally valid academic pursuits.

This implies that essential skills – communication, computation, social-emotional intelligence – are not taught in isolation but are expected to be acquired contextually, much like one learns a mother tongue through immersion. Ratnesh posits that engaging with self-chosen tasks inevitably triggers the need for diverse skills: confronting a missing ingredient while cooking demands immediate problem-solving, creativity, or resource management. Action becomes the crucible where theoretical skills are forged through practical necessity.

Man in yellow shirt next to quote: “Information asymmetry wasn’t just a problem, it was the system,” Sachin observed. Purple background.

Reflect: Activating Metacognition for Growth

The crucial differentiator in this model is the explicit, structured "Reflect" phase. Ratnesh described this not as passive navel-gazing, but as active analysis. Learners systematically examine their experiences, asking why things happened, dissecting frustrations ("Where was I getting stuck?"), and evaluating successes. This isn't left to chance; it's facilitated through peer discussions, mentor interactions, and parent involvement. Comparing the day's 'game' to analyzing a football match afterward captures the essence – turning lived experience into analyzable data. This process actively cultivates metacognition, the learner becomes aware of how they learn, what triggers frustration, and what strategies overcome obstacles.

Documentation further solidifies this phase. Recording reflections (written, video, audio) transforms fleeting thoughts into persistent data points. Periodic portfolio presentations then compel learners to synthesize these reflections, articulate their journey, and provide evidence of their growth – becoming, as Ratnesh termed it, "work certified" by the demonstrable outcomes of their self-directed process, rather than by external grades.

Yellow text on a dark blue background reads: "We call these children work certified...The results are in front of you." - Ratnesh Mathur.

The Design-Do-Reflect cycle, therefore, functions as a closed-loop system for autonomous learning. It substitutes external structure with internal agency ('Design'), replaces siloed instruction with integrated experience ('Do'), and makes metacognitive analysis ('Reflect') the core mechanism for skill development and self-understanding. It’s an operational model predicated on the belief that learners, given the structure to plan, act, and analyze, possess the innate capacity to direct and validate their own education effectively.


Man in plaid shirt smiling on purple background. Text reads: "What I learned from Ratnesh Mathur" in yellow and white.

4 lessons with practical value

Yellow background with four educational statements in bold text: "Agency, Doing, Reflection, Proving" followed by explanatory sentences.

What's next?

Ratnesh isn’t building a school—he’s redesigning how learning happens. In our May feature of Alba’s NoSmalltalk, we unpack how Aarohi’s learner-led model is challenging traditional education by embedding agency, reflection, and real-world application at its core. And in the next blog, “Beyond Drop-Off”, Ratnesh dives into why parent involvement isn’t optional, it’s a structural pillar of the Aarohi ecosystem, and a crucial variable in sustaining deep, self-driven learning.

2 commentaires


Reflection is where the real report card lies not on paper, but in presence.

J'aime

Ratnesh, thank you for vividly detailing Aarohi’s operational core during our NoSmalltalk session. The Design-Do-Reflect cycle emerges not just as a method, but as a potent systemic engine for autonomous learning.


Your insights clarified how this loop systematically builds agency (Design), integrates skill acquisition through action (Do), and—critically—cultivates metacognition via structured analysis (Reflect), fundamentally shifting reliance from external to internal benchmarks.


To begin the discussion: What are the key systemic challenges or necessary cultural shifts required to successfully implement such a self-directed, reflective learning model within more conventional educational or organisational settings?

J'aime

Follow Us On Social Media

Alba.png
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
PA BiZ.png
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

2025 Planet Alba BiZ

All Rights Reserved

bottom of page