What Sustains Ecosystems without a Price tag?

---

My Sustainable Encounter with Arghya Chakrabarty

by Albert Schiller

The Unsettling Paradox: Valuing the Invisible

In the relentless pursuit of economic progress, do we blind ourselves to nature's accurate ledger? Arghya Chakrabarty’s research into the economic evaluation of biodiversity and ecosystem services confronts an "often unsettling paradox": despite sophisticated tools to assign monetary value, both directly and indirectly, "how persistently invisible many ecosystem services remain in decision making even today". This critical oversight, he notes, incurs long-term ecological and societal costs. Readily monetized "provisioning services, such as tourism," are easily accounted for. Yet, vital "regulating services like flood buffering" frequently go unvalued, leading to critical blind spots in policy and investment decisions. The challenge lies in revealing this hidden deficit, as unacknowledged value inevitably leads to unsustainable exploitation and profound environmental degradation.

Beyond Capital: Nature as Kin and Teacher

A particularly "striking insight" from Arghya’s work has been the pervasive undervaluation of "cultural and relational values, especially in indigenous and local contexts". In the wetlands and forest landscapes where he conducts his fieldwork, communities relate to ecosystems not merely as a "natural capital" to be exploited or quantified, but as "teachers, or spiritual entities". These deep, intrinsic relationships are inherently complex and form the fabric of human-nature coexistence. They "don't translate easily into rupees or dollars". The attempt to force these underlying connections into purely monetary terms often serves to "flatten their significance", reducing a rich, multidimensional bond to a simplistic transaction that fails to capture its true essence.

The Peril of Simplification: Unsound and Unjust Policies

Yet, ignoring these invaluable, non-quantifiable dimensions carries severe consequences. Arghya warns that policies developed without acknowledging such cultural and relational values are "ecologically unsound" and "socially unjust". This highlights a critical ethical imperative in conservation: true sustainability demands a valuation framework beyond mere economic metrics. While acknowledging that "valuation frameworks are powerful", he stresses they also "have their limits" and "should not be used just to assign prices". Instead, they aim "to shift attention, to make visible what matters, even when we can't always quantify it neatly". This approach recognizes the inherent dangers of reducing complex relationships to simplistic economic figures, leading to decisions that serve neither nature nor people justly.

A Broader Lens: Ethics and Equity in Valuation

Arghya brings this nuanced lens to his work, leveraging valuation as "a bridge between ecology, equity, and ethics". This perspective fundamentally redefines the role of economic valuation in conservation. It shifts the focus from simply assigning a price tag to a deeper, more comprehensive, and just understanding of nature's worth. By actively seeking to make visible those values that resist easy quantification, Arghya advocates for an approach where conservation is not just about environmental protection, but also about social fairness and ethical responsibility. This holistic framework ensures that policies reflect the full spectrum of an ecosystem's contributions to human well-being, fostering decisions that are truly sustainable and equitable for all stakeholders.

So what can we take from his approach?

Questions for Audience

1. Arghya's research highlights that regulating services like flood buffering often go unvalued. How can policymakers and urban planners better integrate the economic and societal value of such "invisible" ecosystem services into development decisions?

2. The blog discusses communities relating to ecosystems as "teachers, or spiritual entities." How can modern conservation efforts respectfully incorporate these deep cultural and relational values into their strategies, beyond financial incentives or legal frameworks?