The Tiger and the Sheep

---

My NoSmalltalk session with Simran Oberoi

by Albert Schiller

The Myopia for Talent

The corporate world claims to be in a desperate, existential war for talent. It is a compelling narrative of relentless competition for the best and brightest minds, a story repeated in every annual report and keynote speech. Yet this story collapses under the slightest scrutiny. A system at war would be ruthlessly pragmatic, valuing assets for their effectiveness, not their origin. The modern corporate hiring apparatus, however, is not a pragmatic war machine. It is a rigid, pattern-matching engine, structurally incapable of recognizing, let alone valuing, talent that has evolved outside its sanctioned pathways. It is a system that claims to be hunting for tigers but is only programmed to see sheep that follow a concrete, linear path to the slaughterhouse of mediocrity.

High Quality Waste

Simran Oberoi’s experience is a clinical deconstruction of this systemic myopia. After becoming an outcast from a rigid corporate structure, she spent years as a high-level independent consultant and built a social enterprise from the ground up. This is a resume that screams resilience, adaptability, and entrepreneurial grit, the very traits every CEO claims to covet in a rapidly changing world. Yet, the system’s diagnostic tools processed this data as a fatal error. Her experience was not seen as an upgrade in agility but as a "gap," a deviation that rendered her "unfit" for a corporate role. However, this is not an innocent oversight. It is a fundamental design flaw. The hiring machine is not built to assess competence. It is built to assess conformity to a pre-existing, unquestioned template. Any data mismatch is not analyzed. It is simply discarded, leaving behind high-value outcasts.

An Ideological Break

The system's most effective weapon in maintaining this flawed structure is language. The term "career break" is an ideological tool that reframes a period of intense, self-directed professional growth into a narrative of self-inflicted absence. It creates a void where substance exists. This fallacy triggers a defense mechanism. By devaluing unconventional experience, the system reinforces the primacy of its own internal career ladder. It sends every employee a message that the only experience that matters is the experience we create and sanction. Any deviation from this path will be punished. You are either inside the walls or do not exist in a form we appreciate.

Overpowered 

The ultimate irony is that the system, in its desperate search for resilient and innovative talent, is actively filtering out the people who have proven to possess these traits in the most demanding, high-friction environments. It is institutional self-sabotage, driven by a fear of the unknown and a submissive devotion to outdated patterns. The void is not on the resumes of professionals like Simran Oberoi, who were forced to evolve to survive. The void is in the imagination of the system itself, a blindness that prioritizes the comfort of a predictable pattern over the potent, competitive advantage of an evolved human being.

5 Lessons with practical values-

Open Questions

1. If a system is structurally incapable of recognizing evolved talent, can it be reformed from within, or is its eventual irrelevance and collapse inevitable?

2. In an economy that increasingly demands adaptability and entrepreneurial skills, what is the long-term cost for companies that continue penalizing the professionals who have demonstrated these traits?