Wealth and Social Entrepreneurship. Why Social Impact requires Financial Literacy
- Albert Schiller
- May 7
- 3 min read
Updated: May 24
My NoSmalltalk session with Gauri Malik
The development sector often operates under an implicit, sometimes explicit, assumption that pursuing social good necessitates a detachment from personal financial ambition. Wealth, in this context, can be viewed with suspicion, a potential conflict with an often expected to be otherwise altruistic mission.
Gauri Malik, founder of Sirohi, directly challenges this deeply ingrained taboo. Drawing from her finance background and her experience building a social enterprise, she presents a pragmatic case for why adequate compensation and financial sustainability are not just acceptable, but operationally necessary for attracting talent, ensuring founder longevity, and ultimately achieving scalable, lasting social impact.
The Cost of the Compensation Taboo
Gauri observes a distinct culture within the social sector that implicitly discourages overt discussion or pursuit of wealth. She argues this has tangible negative consequences, primarily in talent acquisition. "This sector doesn't attract the right kind of talent," she stated, "because they feel that. Oh, it's a social sector, you know. The job will be easy and cushy, or I reached a stage in my life now, where... I've earned enough money. And now I want to give back." This mindset, she implies, either attracts less economically capable individuals or those seeking a post-career "give back" role, potentially lacking the drive or skills needed for high-impact, scalable solutions. By failing to offer compensation competitive with other sectors for comparable skills and education, the social sector may inadvertently filter out precisely the kind of high-caliber, ambitious talent required to solve complex problems effectively.

Founder Sustainability: The Logic of Self-Interest
Gauri extends this argument to the sustainability of the founders themselves. She confronted this directly during an incubator program when expressing her personal financial goals alongside her social mission. "I want to make sure that I earn enough wealth for myself as a woman and for the women around me," she told them, only to be questioned about her motivation. Her rebuttal was grounded in pragmatic logic: "If I'm not happy with what I'm getting paid, you know, at the end of it, I will burn out."
She argues that as humans we need to provide for oneself and one’s family. It is a fundamental drive. Denying this need, or expecting founders to operate indefinitely without fair compensation equivalent to their peers and education, creates an unsustainable model prone to burnout, ultimately jeopardizing the mission itself. Having financial stability for the founder isn't greed; she states it's a necessary condition for long-term commitment and effectiveness.

Beyond Charity: Scalability Requires a Business Mindset
Furthermore, Gauri critiques the limitations of purely philanthropic or charity-based models within the development sector. She recounts questioning organizations working with communities for 15 years without achieving significant, measurable change ("How is it they're exactly in the same place...?"). This lack of progress, she deduced, often stems from a failure to adopt a scalable, business-oriented mindset.
"You have to have a business and a scalable model. With whatever you do, you have to be able to use data metrics to be able to see. How far have the women come...?" she argued. Relying solely on philanthropy is inherently vulnerable ("at some point the funding will run out"). Sustainable impact, especially at scale, requires incorporating business principles – including financial planning, metrics, and potentially revenue generation – to ensure long-term viability and measure real-world outcomes, such as the financial independence she aims for with Sirohi's artisans.
Gauri Malik’s perspective offers a necessary corrective to the often-unexamined assumptions surrounding money in the social impact space. By framing fair compensation and financial sustainability not as antithetical to the mission but as essential tools for attracting talent, preventing burnout, and enabling scalable impact, she provides a logical argument for integrating sound business principles within social enterprises. It's a call to move beyond the limiting taboo of wealth and embrace financial viability as a critical enabler of lasting social change.

5 Lessons with practical value

This is such an empowering message, especially for women founders. Wanting to build wealth and impact isn’t selfish, it’s smart, strategic, and necessary.
This conversation does such a great job normalizing something rarely said aloud: social impact work doesn't exempt us from needing financial security. Gauri speaks with clarity and courage.
Absolutely agree with the need to reframe founder compensation as a mission-sustaining input, not a moral compromise. This mindset shift is long overdue in the social sector.